BIBLIOMETRIK DAN KAJIAN PUSTAKA TENTANG RISET TRANSFER EMBRIO PADA SAPI PERAH: SATU DEKADE TERAKHIR DALAM DATABASE SCOPUS
Abstract
Tujuan penulisan karya ilmiah ini adalah mengeksplorasi dan menyajikan data tren penelitian tentang transfer embrio (TE) 10 tahun terakhir pada database scopus untuk stakeholder pada industri perah di Indonesia. Kajian pustaka dilakukan dengan penelusuran ilmiah dalam Google Scholar, skimming dan seleksi, serta sintesis kajian. Analisis bibliometrik dilakukan dengan penelusuran ilmiah pada database scopus dengan kata kunci ("embryo transfer") AND ("dairy" OR "cattle" OR "cow" OR "bovine"), ekstraksi (limit to and exclude), analisis dengan Vosviewer dan RStudio, dan sintesis kajian. Hasil kajian menunjukkan bahwa kajian TE pada sapi perah mulai meningkat kembali pasca Pandemi Covid 19 (2022). Publikasi artikel TE tertinggi berdasarkan author adalah PS Baruselli dan PJ Hansen, berdasarkan institusi adalah University of Florida, berdasarkan negara adalah Brazil, berdasarkan benua adalah Amerika. Publikasi dengan korespondensi Indonesia baru tercatat sebanyak 2 dokumen. Berdasarkan kata kunci, objek penelitian berupa “female” dan “animal” adalah yang paling banyak muncul. Selain itu, kata kunci embryo transfer dan pregnancy merupakan metode dan output penelitian yang paling banyak muncul. Berdasarkan sebaran kepadatan, kata kunci yang paling ideal pada tren terkini adalah “in vitro fertilization” dan “blastocysts”, sedangkan yang paling potensial untuk mendapatkan riset gap dan novelty adalah “genetic”, “genotype”, “genomics”, “clanixin”, “analogs and derivates”, dan “anti-inflammatory agents”. Prosedur aplikasi TE meliputi superovulasi induk donor, inseminasi buatan, koleksi embrio, dan transfer embrio ke induk resipien. Masing-masing tahapan memiliki potensi kajian penelitian yang beragam. Penelitian TE pada sapi perah di Indonesia masih sangat terbatas, sehingga potensial di kembangkan. Kajian ini memiliki riset gap dan potensi novelty yang beragam berdasarkan pada kondisi di Indonesia, serta hasilnya akan sangat bermanfaat untuk mendukung pengembangan industri ternak perah di Indonesia.
References
American Embryo Transfer Association. 2014. AETA Annual Surveys. www.aeta.org/survey.asp.
Baruselli, PS, CA Rodrigues, RM Ferreira, JNS Sales, FM Elliff, LG Silva,... & JD Michael. 2021. Impact of oocyte donor age and breed on in vitro embryo production in cattle, and relationship of dairy and beef embryo recipients on pregnancy and the subsequent performance of offspring: A review. Reproduction, Fertility and Development, 34(2), 36-51.
Baruselli, PS, BLC Catussi, & LAD Abreu. 2022. Use of reproductive biotechnologies to improve the fertility of repeat-breeder and heat-stressed dairy cows. SPERMOVA, 12(1), 112-117.
Bonilla, L, J Block, AC Denicol, PJ, & Hansen. 2014. Consequences of transfer of an in vitro-produced embryo for the dam and resultant calf. Journal of Dairy Science, 97(1), 229-239.
Capelouto, SM, ZP Nagy, DB Shapiro, SR Archer, DP Ellis, AK Smith,... & HS Hipp. 2018. Impact of male partner characteristics and semen parameters on in vitro fertilization and obstetric outcomes in a frozen oocyte donor model. Fertility and Sterility, 110(5), 859-869.
David, A & S Hamilton. 2016. Hamco Cattle Co. 18th Annual Angus bull sale. Glenboro, Manitoba, Canada.
Estrada-Cortés, E, WG Ortiz, RC Chebel, EA Jannaman, JI Moss, FC de Castro, ... & PJ Hansen. 2019. Embryo and cow factors affecting pregnancy per embryo transfer for multiple-service, lactating Holstein recipients. Translational Animal Science, 3(1), 60-65.
Ferraz, PA, C Burnley, J Karanja, A Viera-Neto, JEP Santos, RC Chebel, & KN Galvão. 2016. Factors affecting the success of a large embryo transfer program in Holstein cattle in a commercial herd in the southeast region of the United States. Theriogenology, 86(7), 1834-1841.
Hasler, JF. 2014. Forty years of embryo transfer in cattle: A review focusing on the journal Theriogenology, the growth of the industry in North America, and personal reminisces. Theriogenology, 81(1), 152-169.
Kaniyamattam, K, J Block, PJ Hansen, & A De Vries. 2018. Economic and genetic performance of various combinations of in vitro-produced embryo transfers and artificial insemination in a dairy herd. Journal of Dairy Science, 101(2), 1540-1553.
Kipper, BH, JT Trevizan, JT Carreira, IR Carvalho, GZ Mingoti, ME Beletti, ... & MB Koivisto. 2017. Sperm morphometry and chromatin condensation in Nelore bulls of different ages and their effects on IVF. Theriogenology, 87, 154-160.
Lafontaine, S, R Labrecque, P Blondin, RI Cue, & MA Sirard. 2023. Comparison of cattle derived from in vitro fertilization, multiple ovulation embryo transfer, and artificial insemination for milk production and fertility traits. Journal of Dairy Science, 106(6), 4380-4396.
Mapletoft, RJ, & GA Bó. 2018. Innovative strategies for superovulation in cattle. Animal Reproduction (AR), 10(3), 174-179.
Mapletoft, RJ, PS Baruselli, & GA Bo. 2022. Fisiología relacionada al uso de la eCG en ganado de carne y leche. SPERMOVA, 12(1), 83-91.
Maulana, I. 2019. Tingkat Keberhasilan Superovulasi Pada Berbagai Umur Sapi Donor. Naskah Publikasi Program Studi Peternakan.
Mebratu, B, H Fesseha, & E Goa. 2020. Embryo transfer in cattle production and its principle and applications. International Journal of Pharmacy & Biomedical Research, 7(1), 40-54.
Miller, S. 2022. Genomic selection in beef cattle creates additional opportunities for embryo technologies to meet industry needs. Reproduction, Fertility and Development.
Muchlis, A, S Sema, AL Toleng, & H Sonjaya. 2022. Penerapan Bioteknologi Dalam Produksi Ternak Untuk Meningkatkan Produk Asal Hewan. Jurnal Ilmu dan Teknologi Peternakan Terpadu, 2(1), 95-100.
Nowicki, A. 2021. Embryo transfer as an option to improve fertility in repeat breeder dairy cows. Journal of Veterinary Research, 65(2), 231-237.
Phillips, PE, & MM Jahnke. 2016. Embryo transfer (techniques, donors, and recipients). Veterinary Clinics: Food Animal Practice, 32(2), 365-385.
Praharani, L, RG Sianturi, DA Kusumaningrum, & O Parlindungan. 2020. Berat Lahir dan Mortalitas Anak Sapi Belgian Blue dari Rumpun Resipien dan Ketinggian Tempat Berbeda. In Prosiding Seminar Nasional Teknologi Peternakan dan Veteriner (pp. 45-54).
Said, S, PP Agung, WPB Putra, & EM Kaiin. 2020. The role of biotechnology in animal production. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science (Vol. 492, No. 1, p. 012035). IOP Publishing.
Sala, RV, LF Melo, JCL Motta, L Leffers-Neto, LC Carrenho-Sala, M Fosado, ... & A García-Guerra. 2020. Optimization of a 5-day fixed-time embryo transfer (FTET) protocol in heifers I. Manipulation of circulating progesterone through reutilization of intravaginal progesterone devices during FTET. Theriogenology, 156, 171-180.
Selk, G. 2002. Embryo transfer in cattle. Oklahoma Cooperative Extension Service.
Siqueira, LG, S Dikmen, MS Ortega, & PJ Hansen. 2017. Postnatal phenotype of dairy cows is altered by in vitro embryo production using reverse X-sorted semen. Journal of Dairy Science, 100(7), 5899-5908.
Sophian, E, & F Afiati. 2016. Peranan bioteknologi reproduksi dalam peningkatan kualitas ternak. Biotrends, 7(1), 42-47.
Valente, RS, TV Marsico, & MJ Sudano. 2022. Basic and applied features in the cryopreservation progress of bovine embryos. Animal Reproduction Science, 239, 106970.
Vieira, LM, CA Rodrigues, MF Mendanha, MFD Sá Filho, JNSD Sales, AH Souza, ... & PS Baruselli. 2014. Donor category and seasonal climate associated with embryo production and survival in multiple ovulation and embryo transfer programs in Holstein cattle. Theriogenology, 82(2), 204-212.
Wrenzycki, C. 2022. Parameters to identify good quality oocytes and embryos in cattle. Reproduction, Fertility and Development, 34(2), 190–202.
Yizengaw, L. 2017. Review on estrus synchronization and its application in cattle. Int. J. Adv. Res. Biol. Sci, 4(4), 67-76.
