The Influence The Influence Of Enviromental Conditions Between Open House And Semi Closed House On The Performance Of Broiler At PT BUSS Sukabumi

Mega Destri Ramadhani; Ismoyowati Ismoyowati; Novie Andri Setianto

doi:10.20884/1.angon.2024.6.1.p71-77

Mega Destri Ramadhani Universitas Jenderal Soedirman
Ismoyowati Ismoyowati
Novie Andri Setianto

DOI: https://doi.org/10.20884/1.angon.2024.6.1.p71-77

Keywords: Broiler, Temperature, Humidity, Cage, Performance

Abstract

The internship entitled "The Effect of Environmental Conditions in Cages Between Open House Cages and Semi-Closed Houses on the Performance of Broiler Chickens on the Performance of Broiler Chickens at PT BUSS Sukabumi" was held on September 15 2021 to December 25 2021, at PT. Berkat Unggas Sehat Sejahtera, Sukabumi, West Java. The purpose of this internship is to analyze the influence of environmental conditions in the cage between open house and semi closed house cages. The method used in this internship is carrying out broiler maintenance activities with a focus on observing the environmental conditions of the cage and the performance of broiler chickens. The target of the internship is broiler chicken farm at PT. Berkat Unggas Sehat Sejahtera. The material used in open house cages was Cobb strain chickens with a total of 6500 population while for semi closed house cages using Rose strain chickens with a population of 12,103 population. The observation took place at PT. Berkat Unggas Sehat Sejahtera. The variables observed were body weight, body weight gain, mortality, feed conversion ratio (FCR), and IP in chickens kept in open house and semi closed house cages. Performance in the open house cage in the fourth week resulted in a body weight of 1530 g with a PBB of 573 g with a mortality rate of 4.75%, then the FCR obtained was 1.48, and the IP was 350. Performance in the semi closed house cage in the fourth week resulted in body weight 1552 g with PBB of 578 g, the mortality rate was 4.34%, then the FCR was 1.43, and the IP was 372. When compared to the open house cage, the temperature in the semi-closed house cage is more conducive to broiler chicken growth. Broiler chickens perform differently in open-house and semi-closed-house cages due to variations in temperature and humidity. The performance of semi-closed house cages is superior to that of open house cages.

References

Alade, O., and A. Ademola. 2013. Perceived effect of climate variation on poultry production in Oke Ogun area of Oyo State. Journal of Agriculture Science. 5:176.
Balogun, A., F. Akinseye, J. Agbede. 2013. Water and feed consumption in broiler birds during a typical hot weather condition in Akure, Ondo State, Nigeria. International Journal of Bio-Chemical Science. 7 :1119- 1125.
Chowdhury VS, Sultana H, Furuse M. 2014. International perspectives on impacts of reproductive technologies for world food production in Asia associated with poultry production. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology. 752: 229-237
Chowdhury, VS., H. Sultana, and M. Furuse. 2014. International perspectives on impacts of reproductive technologies for world food production in Asia associated with poultry production. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology 752 :229-237
Cobb-Vantress. 2015. Cobb 500 Management Guide 2015. Cobb-Vantress, Siloam Springs, AR. Colchester, United Kingdom
Cobb-Vantress. 2018. Cobb Broiler Management Guide 2018. Cobb-Vantress, Siloam Springs, AR. Colchester, United Kingdom
De Souza, Jr JBF., VRM. Oliveira, AMV. Arruda, AM. Silva, and LLM Costa. 2015. The relationship between corn particle size and thermoregulation of laying hens in an equatorial semi-arid environment. International Journal of Biometeorology. 59:121-125.
Dharmawan, R., Prayogi, H. S., & Nurgiartiningsih, V. M. A. 2016. Penampilan produksi ayam pedaging yang dipelihara pada lantai atas dan lantai bawah. Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Peternakan (Indonesian Journal of Animal Science), 26(3), 27-37.
Lin H, Jiao HC, Buyse J, Decuypere E. 2010. Strategies for preventing heat stress in poultry. World’s Poultry Science Journal. 62:71-85
Mahdia, A., P.A. Safitri, R.F. Setiarini, V.F.A. Maherani, M. N. Ahsani dan M. S. Soenarno. 2022. Analisis Keefektifan Ekoenzim sebagai Pembersih Kandang Ayam dari Limbah Buah Jeruk (Citrus sp.). Jurnal Ilmu Produksi dan Tekonologi Hasil Peternakan. 10(1): 42-46.
Marom, A. T., Kalsum, U., & Ali, U. 2018. Evaluasi performans broiler pada sistem Kandan close house dan open house dengan altitude berbeda. Dinamika Rekasatwa., 2(2).
Okere, I. 2014. Growth traits, breast meat yield and quality of broiler genotypes under hot conditions. Iranian Journal of Applied Animal Science. 4:159-164
Osti, R., D. Bhattarai, and D. Zhou. 2017. Climatic Variation: Effects on Stress Levels, Feed Intake, and Bodyweight of Broilers. Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science. 19 (3): 489-496.
Osti, R., Z. Deyi, S. Virendra, B. Dinesh, and C. Harshika. 2016. An Economic Analysis of Poultry Egg Production in Nepal. Pakistan Journal of Nutrition 15: 715-724.
Pakage, S., B. Hartono, Z. Fanani, B. A. Nugroho, D. A. Iyai, J. A. Palulungan, A. R. Ollong, dan D. Nurhayati. 2020. Pengukuran Performa Produksi Ayam Pedaging pada Closed HouseSystemdan Open House Systemdi Kabupaten Malang Jawa Timur Indonesia. Jurnal Sain Peternakan Indonesia. 15 (4): 383 – 389.
Prihandanu, R., A. Trisanto, dan Y. Yuniati. 2015. Model Sistem Kandang Ayam Semi Closed House Otomatis Menggunakan Omron Sysmac CPM1A 20-CDR-A-V1. Jurnal Rekayasa Dan Teknologi Elektro 9(1) : 54-62.
Qurniawan, A., I.I. Arief, dan R. Arfan. 2016. Performans produksi ayam pedaging pada lingkungan pemeliharaan dengan ketinggian yang berbeda di Sulawesi Selatan. J. Veteriner 17(4): 622—633.
Ratnasari, R., Sarengat, W., & Setiadi, A. 2015. Analisis pendapatan peternak ayam broiler pada sistem kemitraan di Kecamatan Gunung Pati Kota Semarang. Animal Agriculture Journal, 4(1), 47-53.
Riswanti, N.A. 2014. Kelayakan Pembesaran Ayam Pedaging Sistem Perkandangan Terbuka dan Tertutup Cv Perdana Putra Chicken Bogor. Skripsi. Institut Pertanian Bogor.
Saputro, D. D., Wijaya, B. R., & Wijayanti, Y.2014. Pengelolaan limbah peternakan sapi untuk meningkatkan kapasitas produksi pada kelompok ternak patra sutera. Rekayasa: Jurnal Penerapan Teknologi dan Pembelajaran, 12(2), 91-98.
Sugito, R., N. A. Setianto, dan Y. N. Wakhidati. 2021. Analisis Ekonomi dan Produksi Usaha Peternakan Ayam Broiler Menggunakan Tipe Kandang Closed house Dua Lantai dan Tiga Lantai di Kabupaten Kebumen. Journal Of Animal Science and Technology. 3(1):104-114.
Sugiyono. 2017. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta
Sumarno, Y. Woli, dan N. Supartini. 2022. Kajian Performa Produksi Ayam Pedaging Pada Sistem Kandang Closed House Dan Open House. Jurnal Agriekstensia. 21(1):42– 50.
Susanti, E.D., M. Dahlan, dan D. Wahyuning. 2016. Perbandingan Produktivitas Ayam Broiler Terhadap Sistem Kandang Terbuka (Open House) Dan Kandang Tertutup (Closed House) Di Ud Sumber Makmur Kecamatan Sumberrejo Kabupaten Bojonegoro. Jurnal Ternak. 7 (1): 1 – 7.
Syamsuri, H. 2019. Kajian Eksperimen Performa Alat Pemanas Kandang Ayam Indukan Ayam Ras terhadap Tingkat Kenyamanan Ayam. Tesis. Bandung: Universitas Pasundan.
Umam, K. M., H. Setyoprayogi dan V. M A. Nurgiatiningsih. 2014. Penampilan Produksi Ayam Broiler yang di Pelihara Pada Sistem Lantai Kandang Panggung dan Kandang Bertingkat. Fak Peternakan. Universitas Brawijaya Press, Malang.
Yasa, I. M. S., Darminta, I. K., dan Ta, I. K. 2019. Kontrol Heat Stress Index Ruangan Ayam Broiler Pada Periode Brooding Secara Otomatis Berbasis Arduino-Uno. Politeknologi, 18 (2): 151-158.