Consumption of Feed And Harvest Weights of Broilers Given Antibiotic Growth Promoters and Non Antibiotic Growth Promoters Weight in A Closed Cage

Cika Firdausi Pikana Utami; Elly Tugiyanti; Emmy Susanti

doi:10.20884/1.angon.2020.2.2.p131-138

Cika Firdausi Pikana Utami Fakultas Peternakan Universitas Jenderal Soedirman, Purwokerto
Elly Tugiyanti Fakultas Peternakan Universitas Jenderal Soedirman, Purwokerto
Emmy Susanti Fakultas Peternakan Universitas Jenderal Soedirman, Purwokerto

DOI: https://doi.org/10.20884/1.angon.2020.2.2.p131-138

Keywords: Antibiotic Growth Promoters, feed consumption, harvest weight, broiler chicken, area

Abstract

Background. This Study is entitled "Consumption of Feed and Harvest Weights of Broilers Given Antibiotic Growth Promoters and Non Antibiotic Growth Promoters Weight in a Closed Cage". Materials and methods. This research was conducted in 3 areas, namely Banyumas, Purbalingga, and Cilacap in December 2019. This study aims to determine the relationship of feed consumption and harvest weight of broilers fed with Antibiotic Growth Promoters and Non Antibiotic Growth Promoters in closed cages. The research method used was a survey with the aim of the research being broiler chicken breeders who became a partnership with PT Cemerlang Poultry Lestari with ownership of broiler totaling 10,000-50,000 in closed cages. Results. Average feed consumption with Antibiotic Growth Promoters in a closed cage in one periode to get results 3,27±0,56 kg/tail, while the average consumption of feed with Non Antibiotic Growth Promoters in a closed cage in one periode to get results 3,16±0,48 kg/tail (P</>0.05). Harvest weights with Antibiotic Growth Promoters in a closed cage in one periode get a result of 1,95±0.23 kg/tail, while the average weight of the harvest with Non Antibiotic Growth Promoters in a closed cage in one periode get a result of 1.91±0.28 kg/tail (P</>0.05). Conclusion.The conclusion of this study is that feed with Antibiotic Growth Promoters and feed with Non Antibiotic Growth Promoters were not significantly different from feed consumption and harvest weight of broiler chickens.

References

Alifian, M. D., Nahrowi., dan D. Evvyernie. 2018. Pengaruh Pemberian Imbuhan Pakan Herbal terhadap Performa Ayam Broiler. Buletin Makanan Ternak. 16(1): 47-57.
Andreas. 2016. Evaluasi Performan Ayam Broiler Strain Cobb Dan Ross Pada Tipe Kandang Close Dan Open. Fakultas Peternakan Universitas Islam Malang. Malang.
Anggitasari, S., O. Sjofjan, dan I. H. Djunaidi. 2016. Pengaruh Beberapa Jenis Pakan Komersial Terhadap Kinerja Produksi Kuantitatif Dan Kualitatif Ayam Pedaging. Buletin Peternakan. 40(3): 187-196.
Chen, P., Q. Zhang, H. Dang, X. Liu, F. Tian, J. Zhao, Y. Chen, H. Zhang, and W. Chan. 2014. Screening for Potential New Probiotic Based on Probiotic Properties and Aglucosidase Inhibitory Activity. Food Control Journal. 35(2): 65-72.
Cobanaglu, F., K. Kucukyilmaz., M. Cinar., M. Bozkurt., A.U. Catli., E. Bintas. 2014. Comparing the Profitability of Organic and Conventional Broiler Production. Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science. 16(1): 89-96.
Marom, A.T., U. Kalsum., dan U. Ali. 2017. Evaluasi Performans Broiler Pada Sistem Kandang Close House Dan Open House Dengan Altitude Berbeda. Jurnal Dinamika Rekasatwa. 2(2) : 1-10.
Masrianto., I. I. Arief., dan E. Taufik. 2019. Analisis Residu Antibiotik Serta Kualitas Daging dan Hati Ayam Broiler Di Kabupaten Pidie Jaya Provinsi Aceh. Jurnal Ilmu Produksi dan Tekonologi Hasil Peternakan. 7(3): 102-110.
Nadzir, A., Tusi. A., dan Haryanto. 2015. Evaluasi Desain Kandang Ayam Broiler Di Desa Rejobinangun, Kecamatan Raman Utara, Kabupaten Lampung Timur. Jurnal Teknik Pertanian Lampung. 4(4): 255-266.
Nazir, M. 2011. Metode Penelitian. Ghalia Indonesia. Bogor.
Nuryati, T. 2019. Analisis Analisis Performans Ayam Broiler Pada Kandang Tertutup Dan Kandang Terbuka. Jurnal Peternakan Nusantara. 5(2): 2442-2541.
Olugbemi, T.S., S.K. Mutayoba., and F.P. Lekule. 2010. Effect of Moringa (Moringa oleifera) Inclusion in Cassava Based Diets Fed to Broiler Chickens. Poultry Science Journal. 9(4): 363-367.
Prihandanu, R., A. Trisanto., dan Y. Yuniati. 2015. Model Sistem Kandang Ayam Closed House Otomatis Menggunakan Omron Sysmac CPM1A 20-CDR-A-V1. Jurnal Rekayasa dan Teknologi Elektro. 9(1) : 54-62.
Sugiyono. 2009. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Alfa Beta. Bandung.
Triawan, A., D. Sudrajat., dan Anggraeni. 2013. Performa Ayam Broiler Yang Diberi Ransum Mengandung Neraca Kation Anion Ransum Yang Berbeda. Jurnal Pertanian. 4(2): 73-81.
Umam, M.K., H.S. Prayogi., dan V.M.A. Nurgiartiningsih. 2014. Penampilan Produksi Ayam Pedaging Yang Dipelihara Pada Sistem Lantai Kandang Panggung Dan Kandang Bertingkat. Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Peternakan. 24(3): 79-87.
Uzer, F., N. Iriyanti dan Roesdiyanto. 2013. Penggunaan pakan fungsional dalam ransum terhadap konsumsi pakan dan pertambahan bobot badan ayam broiler. J. Ilmiah Peternakan. 1 (1): 282-288.