Production Differences Of Egg Magelang And Tegal At Farmer Level

  • Silvia Ade Lupita Faculty of Animal Science, Jenderal Soedirman University, Purwokerto, Indonesia
  • Ismoyowati Ismoyowati Faculty of Animal Science, Jenderal Soedirman University, Purwokerto, Indonesia
  • Ibnu Hari Sulistiyono Faculty of Animal Science, Jenderal Soedirman University, Purwokerto, Indonesia
Keywords: egg production, egg weight

Abstract

Backgrounds. The study of production ability and egg weight is important as a reference for farmers to choose the type of duck to be maintained. The purpose of this research was to study the difference of Duck Day Production (DDP) and the difference of duck egg weight of Magelang and Tegal at farmer level (Magelang and Tegal area). Materials and Methods. The research was conducted by survey method at farmer level. Determination of research location was done by stratified random sampling and sampling with purposive random sampling (production and age of livestock), each area was taken by 10 duck breeders Magelang and 10 breeders Tegal (total 20 breeders) and from each breeder taken egg sample of duck as much as 20 eggs (total400 eggs). Data were analyzed using T test for egg production and Randomly Completed Analisys with nesting pattern for egg weight. Results. The result of T test analysis showed that T hit 2,653> T table 2,131 which means there was not significant between DDP of Tegal ducks 63 ±% and Magelang ducks 74 ±%, Magelang ducks have DDP higher than Tegal. Genetic and environmental affects DDP. Magelang egg weight 66,1 gr / grain lower than duck Tegal 66,8gr / grain. There was no real difference between the weight of Magelang duck eggs and Tegal ducks, but there was a significant difference in egg weight of anatar breeders. Conclusion. Tegal ducks that were kept in the area of Tegal produced lower daily egg production compared to Magelang ducks that were kept in Magelang farms. The duck eggs of Tegal and Magelang ware relatively same, but at the farmer level there is a difference.

References

Case, L.A., M.J. Kelly, S.P. Miller, and B.J. Wood. 2014. Genotype × Environment Interaction as it Relates to Egg Production in Turkeys (Meleagris gallopavo). Journal Animal Science. 88:1957–1966 doi:10.2527/jas.2009-2004
Charles. 1997. “Kandang Close House”. Majalah Infovet. Edisi 047 Juni. Jakarta
Ismoyowati dan Datta Dewi P. 2013. Produksi dan Kualitas Telur Itik Lokal di Daerah Sentra Peternakan
Itik. Journal Pembangunan Pedesaan. Nomor 1(13) hal 11-16
Jull, M.A. 1951. Poultry Husbandry. 3th Ed. Grow Book Company Inc. New York. Hal: 50-54.
Kementrian Pertanian. 2013. Pedoman Pembibitan Itik Lokal yang Baik. Direktoral Jenderal Peternakan dan Kesehatan Hewan. Jakarrta
Nugraha, F.S., M. Mufti, I.H. Setiawan. 2013.Kualitas Telur Itik yang dipelihara secara Basah dan Kering di Kabupaten Cirebon. Jurnal Ilmiah Peternakan .1(2): 726 - 734.
Prasetyo, L.H., P.P.Kateren dan P.S. Hardjosworo. 2006. Perkembangan teknologi budidaya itik di Indonesia. Lokakarya Unggas Air II. Balai Penelitian Ternak, Bogor. Hal : 145-161.
Purwantini. 2002. Produksi dan Kualitas Itik Lokal di Daerah Sentra Peternakan Itik. Unsoed,Purwokerto.
Sari, O., B. Priyono, N.R. Utami . 2012. Suhu, Kelembaban, serta Produksi Telur Itik pada Kandang Tipe Litter dan Slat. Unnes Journal of Life Science. 1 (2)(2012)
Setiawati T. 2016. Performa Produksi dan Kualitas Telur Ayam Petelur pada Sistem Litter dan Cage dengan Suhu Kandang Berbeda. Jurnal Ilmu Produksi dan Teknologi Hasil Peternakan. No. 1(4). Hlm: 197-203
Setioko, A.R., L.H. Prasetyo, S. Sopiyana, T. Susanti, R. Hernawati, S. Widodo. 2004. Koleksi dan Evaluasi Karakterisasi Biologik Itik Lokal dan Entog secara Exsitu. Laporan Hasil-hasil Penelitian Balitnak, CiawiBogor.
Septyana, M. 2008. Performa Itik Petelur Lokal dengan Pemberian Tepung Daun Katuk (Sauropus androgynus (L.) Merr.) dalam Ransumnya. Skipsi . Fakultas Peternakan. IPB. Bogor.
Steel, R.G.D., dan J.H. Torrie. 1993. Prinsip dan Prosedur Statistiks. Gramedia Pustaka Utama, Jakarta.
Susanti, T. Sopiyana, S. Purba, M. Prasetyo, L.H. Iskandar, Raharjo. 2006, Koleksi dan karakterisasi biologis itik dan entog secara ex-situ di Balai Penelitian Ternak. Laporan Hasil-Hasil Penelitian, Balai Penelitian Ternak. Bogor.
Tůmová, E., and R.M. Gous. 2012 . Interaction of Hen Production Type, Age, and Temperature on Laying Pattern and Egg Quality. Poultry Science . 91 :1269–1275 http://dx.doi.org/ 10.3382/ps.201101951
Wahju, J. 1997. Ilmu Nutrisi Unggas. Gadjah Mada University Press. Yogyakarta. Hal: 68-87
Yuwono, D.M., Subiharta, Hermawan, Hartono. 2006. Produktivitas Itik Tegal di Sentra Pengembangan pada Pemeliharaan Intensif. Balai Pengkajian Teknologi Pertanian Jawa Tengah. Ungaran.
Published
2019-07-22
How to Cite
[1]
S. Lupita, I. Ismoyowati, and I. Sulistiyono, “Production Differences Of Egg Magelang And Tegal At Farmer Level”, ANGON: Journal of Animal Science and Technology, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 281-288, Jul. 2019.
Section
Articles