THE EFFECT OF CLOSED HOUSE STOCKING DENSITY LEVEL ON FEED CONSUMPTION AND CONVERSION OF COBB BROILER CHICKEN

Tisha Bunga Mustika; Ismoyowati Ismoyowati; Muhamad Samsi

doi:10.20884/1.angon.2021.3.2.p141-148

Tisha Bunga Mustika Animal Science Faculty, Jenderal Soedirman University
Ismoyowati Ismoyowati Animal Science Faculty, Jenderal Soedirman University
Muhamad Samsi Animal Science Faculty, Jenderal Soedirman University

DOI: https://doi.org/10.20884/1.angon.2021.3.2.p141-148

Keywords: broiler chickens, stocking density, feed consumption, feed conversion, closed house

Abstract

Background. The purpose of this research was to study the effect of closed house stocking density level on feed consumption and conversion cobb broiler chickens. Materials and Methods. The material used in this study was 200 unisex cobb broiler chickens. Cobb broiler chickens were reared for 34 days and harvested at 5 weeks of age. The research materials consisted of S-00 booster feed which was given to broiler chickens in the early pre-starter period of 0-10 days, S-11 feed was given at the age of 11-21 days in the starter period, and S-12G feed was given at the age of 22 days until harvesting in the finisher period from the production of PT Charoen Pokphand Indonesia. Feed and drink were given with measure adlibitum at 06.00; 11.00; 16.00; 21.00. The research was conducted using experimental methods based on a completely randomized design (CRD). The treatments used was closed house stocking density which consisted of 5 treatments: T1 = 8 chickens / m²; T2 = 9 chickens / m²; T3 = 10 chickens / m²; T4 = 11 chickens / m²; T5 = 12 chickens / m², each treatment replicated 4 times. The variables measured were consumption and feed conversion. The data obtained were analyzed using analysis of variance. Results. The results of the analysis of variance showed that stocking density had no significant effect (P> 0.05) on the consumption and feed conversion of Cobb broiler chickens at week 4 and week 5. Average feed consumption for the fourth week at P1 (1087.59 ± 32, 83), P2 (1081.38 ± 22.39), P3 (1066.70 ± 42.63), P4 (1090.27 ± 16.21), P5 (1069.95 ± 14.21), while the average feed consumption in the 5th week on P1 (987.31 ± 52.18), P2 (961.11 ± 36.78), P3 (933.17 ± 43, 45), P4 (948.56 ± 64.46), P5 (970.79 ± 42.53). Conclusion. The conclusion of this study was that stocking density with an area of 8-12 chicken / m² gave relatively the same response to consumption and feed conversion.

References

Fahrudin, A., W. Tanwiriah., dan H. Indrijani. 2016. Konsumsi Ransum, Pertambahan Bobot Badan Dan Konversi Ransum Ayam Lokal di Jimmy’s Farm Cipanas Kabupaten Cianjur. Jurnal Fakultas Peternakan, Universitas Padjadjaran.
Gunawan, dan D.T.H. Sihombing. 2004. Pengaruh Suhu Lingkungan Tinggi Terhadap Kondisi Fisiologis Dan Produktivitas Ayam Buras. Wartazoa. 14(1): 32-38.
Hapsari, I. N., P. E. Santosa., Dan Riyanti. 2016. Perbedaan Sistem Brooding Konvensional Dan Sistem Brooding Thermos Terhadap Respon Fisiologis Broiler. Jurnal Ilmiah Peternakan Terpadu. 4(3): 237-243.
Mahmud, A, T. B. A., R. Afnan, D. R. Ekastuti., I. I. Arief. 2017. Profil Darah, Performans dan Kualitas Daging Ayam Persilangan Kampung Broiler pada Kepadatan Kandang Berbeda. Jurnal Veteriner. 18(2): 247-256.
Mariyam, S., & Tantalo, S. 2020. Pengaruh Kepadatan Kandang Terhadap Konsumsi Ransum, Pertambahan Berat Tubuh, Dan Konversi Ransum Broiler Umur 14-28 Hari Di Closed house. Jurnal Riset dan Inovasi Peternakan (Journal of Research and Innovation of Animals). 4(1): 35-40.
Nuryati, T. 2019. Analisis Performans Ayam Broiler Pada Kandang Tertutup Dan Kandang Terbuka. Jurnal Peternakan Nusantara. 5(2): 77-86.
Paliadi, T., Widjastuti, A., dan Mushawwir. 2015. Thermoregulasi Dan Hen Day Production Ayam Petelur Fase Layer Pada Temperature Humidity Index Yang Berbeda Thermoregulation and Hen Day Production of Laying Hen in Difference of Temperature Humidity Index. Universitas Padjajaran. 4(4): 1-8.
Putra, C. G. N., Maulana, R., & Fitriyah, H. 2018. Otomasi Kandang Dalam Rangka Meminimalisir Heat Stress Pada Ayam Broiler Dengan Metode Naive Bayes. Jurnal Pengembangan Teknologi Informasi dan Ilmu Komputer. 2(1): 387-394.
Putri, A. M., Muharlien, M., & Nursita, I. W. 2017. Pengaruh Sistem Lantai Dan Tingkat Kepadatan Kandang Terhadap Performance Produksi Ayam Arab Jantan Periode Grower. Ternak Tropika Journal of Tropical Animal Production. 18(2): 69-78.
Razak, A. D., K. Kiramang., M. N. Hidayat. 2016. Pertambahan Bobot Badan, Konsumsi Ransum Dan Konversi Ransum Ayam Ras Pedaging Yang Diberikan Tepung Daun Sirih (Piper Betle Linn) Sebagai Imbuhan Pakan. Jurnal Ilmu Dan Industri Perternakan. 3(1): 135-147.
Statistik Peternakan Dan Kesehatan Hewan. 2020. Direktorat Jenderal Peternakan dan Kesehatan Hewan.
Suwarta. 2006. Feed Conversion Ratio (FCR) Usaha Ternak Ayam Brolier Di Kabupaten Sleman. Universitas Widyagama Malang. 1-10.
Tagueha, A. D., Liur, I. J., & Rajab, R. 2018. Performa Produksi Beberapa Galur Ayam Buras Yang Diberi Jamu Fermentasi. Agrinimal Jurnal Ilmu Ternak dan Tanaman. 6(1): 39-43.
Wijayanti, R. P., W. Busono., Dan R. Indrati. 2011. Pengaruh Suhu Kandang Yang Berbeda Terhadap Performans Ayam Pedaging Periode Starter. Universitas Brawijaya. Malang
Woro, I. D., U. Atmomarsono dan R. Muryani. 2019. Pengaruh Pemeliharaan pada Kepadatan Kandang yang Berbeda terhadap Performa Ayam Broiler. Jurnal Sain Peternakan Indonesia. 14(4): 418-423.
Yani. A., H. Suhardiyanto, Erizal and B.P. Purwanto. 2014. Analysis of air temperature distribution in a closed house for broiler in wet tropical climate. Media Peternakan. Journal of Animal Science Technologi. 37(2): 87 – 100.